IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v5y2020i2p180-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Countering foreign interference: election integrity lessons for liberal democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Henschke
  • Matthew Sussex
  • Courteney O’Connor

Abstract

Liberal democracies and their allies are facing a generational challenge from increased and evolving efforts by foreign actors to undermine public trust and degrade democracy. This article examines the problem of foreign interference with particular reference to the US midterm elections of 2018 as a case study, to draw potential lessons for liberal democracies in advance of future democratic processes. These lessons are centred upon five vulnerabilities to malicious actors, which – if exploited, either partly or wholly – can potentially degrade a democratic political system. The five vulnerabilities incorporate democratic institutions, election infrastructure and private industry. They also include individuals, and the core ideas that underpin democratic norms and values. We call these the ‘Five Is’. The paper outlines the challenges facing the integrity of elections for liberal democracies and fills out the concept of the ‘Five Is’. We note that the ‘Five Is’ are causally linked and overlapping. Having discussed the ‘Five Is’, we then look at the US 2018 midterms as a way to clarify and specify the ‘Five Is’ in practice. The paper then offers eight recommendations for policymakers to increase the resilience of electoral processes to such threats and attacks.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Henschke & Matthew Sussex & Courteney O’Connor, 2020. "Countering foreign interference: election integrity lessons for liberal democracies," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 180-198, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:5:y:2020:i:2:p:180-198
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2020.1797136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2020.1797136
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2020.1797136?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:5:y:2020:i:2:p:180-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.