IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v2y2017i2p195-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards estimating the untapped potential: a global malicious DDoS mean capacity estimate

Author

Listed:
  • Eireann Leverett
  • Aaron Kaplan

Abstract

What is the malicious reflected distributed denial of service (rDDoS) mean potential of the internet? The authors have been using data from the openNTP project which measures the number of reflectors on the internet since 2014 until now, and completed a graph that roughly estimates a lower boundary for global rDDoS mean potential across four internet protocols (IPs); SSDP, NTP, SNMP and open recursive DNS. By summing these values, and adjusting for average uplink capacity from reflectors, we come to a single number: 108.49 Tb/s as an estimate of rDDoS magnitude potential across IPv4. Tracking this number over time can give us insights into global remediation and clean-up efforts and where to invest our resources in when battling of rDDoS attacks. This paper demonstrates that the upstream throughput is the main contributing, measurable limiting factor for a volumetric rDDoS attack. The largest DDoS event reported by a single target (Dyn in 2016) was 1.2 Tb/s. In contrast, our lower estimate for the global attack potential is two orders of magnitude larger than the Dyn attack.The key contribution is an extensible methodology for measuring global potential for rDDoS attacks, with surprising policy implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Eireann Leverett & Aaron Kaplan, 2017. "Towards estimating the untapped potential: a global malicious DDoS mean capacity estimate," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 195-208, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:195-208
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2017.1362020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2017.1362020
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2017.1362020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:195-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.