IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcybxx/v10y2025i1p13-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adoption of cybersecurity policies at the grassroots: 2022

Author

Listed:
  • Donald F. Norris
  • Laura K. Mateczun

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the adoption of cybersecurity policies by local governments in the United States using data from four local government cybersecurity surveys that were conducted in 2016, 2018, 2020 and 2022. Among other things, we asked whether local governments had adopted formal cybersecurity plans and other policies, purchased cybersecurity insurance, offered or mandated cybersecurity training for staff, officials and on-site contractors, or taken one or more of seven specific actions to improve their cybersecurity, adopted one or more of three cybersecurity agreements with other organisations, applied for and/or had received external funding to improve their cybersecurity from the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and/or the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and last, we asked what the biggest challenges in cybersecurity that these governments believed that they faced. Our most significant finding is that local governments have not done an adequate job in adopting cybersecurity policies. Likewise, these governments lagged in taking specific actions to improve their cybersecurity. A few governments have entered into agreements with other entities to assist them in improving their cybersecurity or recovering from breaches. Finally, we made recommendations to help local governments improve their cybersecurity.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald F. Norris & Laura K. Mateczun, 2025. "Adoption of cybersecurity policies at the grassroots: 2022," Journal of Cyber Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 13-33, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:13-33
    DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2025.2512459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23738871.2025.2512459
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23738871.2025.2512459?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcybxx:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:13-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcyb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.