IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcojxx/v19y2008i1p151-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Plus One Still Equals Two: Inclusion and Exclusion in the Japanese Family

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Adis Tahhan

Abstract

This article explores family dynamics in Japan as reflected in Japanese sleeping practices. sleep, in a Japanese context, is often associated with co-sleeping (soine) and feelings of skinship [intimacy through touch]. Ethnographic research, undertaken in 2005 in North-East and Western Honshu, indicates that there is an identity logic in certain sleeping practices that incorporates a ‘purposeful tension’, while in others, there is a relational logic in which skinship is manifest. In this article, I explore these states of relationality through kawa no ji [sleeping with the child in between parents]. Empirical evidence derived from participant-observations and interviews provides the basis for understanding two relational states in soine: exclusive and inclusive family relations. in exclusive relations, kawa no ji is used to separate or alienate a member (or members) of a family, while inclusive relations establish a connection and all-encompassing space ‘between the family’ that provide possibilities for skinship. This article offers an understanding of how the space is inhabited ‘between the family’, and how this constrains or allows intimacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Adis Tahhan, 2008. "Two Plus One Still Equals Two: Inclusion and Exclusion in the Japanese Family," Contemporary Japan, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 151-168, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:151-168
    DOI: 10.1080/09386491.2008.11826954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09386491.2008.11826954
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09386491.2008.11826954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcojxx:v:19:y:2008:i:1:p:151-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcoj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.