IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v2y2014i4p253-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A personal perspective on protecting investors of publicly listed Chinese firms

Author

Listed:
  • Bin Ke

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to provide a personal perspective on how to protect investors of publicly listed Chinese firms. The key points of my discussion can be summarized as follows. First, I describe China’s investor protection problems and then discuss the importance of investor protection in China. This discussion raises the possibility that strong investor protection may not be a necessary condition for a nation’s economic prosperity. Second, I propose a conceptual framework that I argue all stakeholders should use when judging the superiority of alternative investor protection mechanisms. Third, I analyze the challenges and opportunities for academic researchers interested in studying China’s investor protection. I highlight the difficulty of drawing causal inferences from observed data, the difficulty of quantifying all costs and benefits of regulatory reforms, and the difficulty of China’s unique institutional environment, which may call for investor protection mechanisms with Chinese characteristics. I also identify exciting new research opportunities that China presents to corporate governance researchers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bin Ke, 2014. "A personal perspective on protecting investors of publicly listed Chinese firms," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 253-263, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:253-263
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2014.953383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2014.953383
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2014.953383?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:253-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.