IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v13y2025i1-2p186-218.html

The interactive quality of earnings communication conferences and post-earnings-announcement drift

Author

Listed:
  • Sihai Li
  • Ruiqi Wang
  • Yiming Huang

Abstract

Delivering information through regular or temporary reports is not the final step in disclosure. Using the Word2Vec model, we assess the interaction quality of earnings communication conferences, and find that high interaction quality mitigates the post-earnings-announcement drift (PEAD). Interaction quality on performance-related questions, especially performance interpretation questions, plays a crucial role. Mechanism test reveals that investors interpret annual report information more comprehensively and consistently after earnings communication conference. The mitigating effect is more pronounced in firms with longer interval between the conference and the annual report, firms not involved in margin trading and short selling, and those reporting negative unexpected earnings. The disclosure of first quarter reports after earnings communication conferences can offset this effect. We provide empirical evidence, from the perspective of interaction quality, to validate the ‘quality of content’ in the earnings communication conference and its contribution to enhancing information efficiency in the Chinese capital market.

Suggested Citation

  • Sihai Li & Ruiqi Wang & Yiming Huang, 2025. "The interactive quality of earnings communication conferences and post-earnings-announcement drift," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1-2), pages 186-218, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:13:y:2025:i:1-2:p:186-218
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2025.2473999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2025.2473999
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2025.2473999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:13:y:2025:i:1-2:p:186-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.