IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i19p3109-3127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-family policies and perceived organisational support as drivers of well-being and satisfaction among employees in the tourism industry

Author

Listed:
  • José María Biedma-Ferrer
  • José Aurelio Medina-Garrido
  • Maria Bogren
  • Helena Almeida

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of accessible work-family policies (WFP) and organisational support on job satisfaction mediated by employee well-being. Furthermore, it examined whether these relationships differed depending on employees’ gender and family responsibilities. The study involved 568 participants employed in the Spanish tourism industry, including front-line workers and managerial staff, with a similar proportion of male and female employees, nearly half of whom had family responsibilities. The valid questionnaires were analyzed using the PLS-SEM technique. The results highlighted the importance of organisational support and the accessibility of WFP in determining satisfaction in the workplace. While WFP accessibility had a residual effect, organisational support had a more substantial impact on overall satisfaction. Moreover, emotional and physical well-being (EWB, PWB) were crucial factors that directly influenced job satisfaction and mediated the relationship. The study revealed that family responsibilities and gender significantly shaped the relationships between organisational support, WFP accessibility, EWB, and PWB.

Suggested Citation

  • José María Biedma-Ferrer & José Aurelio Medina-Garrido & Maria Bogren & Helena Almeida, 2025. "Work-family policies and perceived organisational support as drivers of well-being and satisfaction among employees in the tourism industry," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(19), pages 3109-3127, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:19:p:3109-3127
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2381241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2381241
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2381241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:19:p:3109-3127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.