IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i19p3069-3085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can ‘brand effect’ promote the development of the tourism economy? – A quasi-natural experiment based on 204 cities

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Guo
  • Yong Wang

Abstract

Tourism branding is crucial for the high-quality development of the tourism economy. Governmental departments foster this development by creating distinctive tourism brands through ‘scenic spot selection’, thereby stimulating regional economic growth via the ‘brand effect’. This study employs the ‘5A’ scenic spot selection as a quasi-natural experiment, utilising panel data from 204 prefecture-level cities in China spanning 2007–2019. It applies staggered difference-in-differences and spatial difference-in-differences methods to evaluate the policy impact of scenic spot selection on urban tourism economic development and to analyze its heterogeneity and spatial effects. The findings demonstrate that high-grade scenic spots can indeed foster tourism economic development through the ‘brand effect’, although disparities exist among regions. This paper elucidates the policy implications of scenic spot selection on tourism economic development and offers a critical reference for optimising the spatial allocation of tourism resources and cultivating distinctive tourism brands.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Guo & Yong Wang, 2025. "Can ‘brand effect’ promote the development of the tourism economy? – A quasi-natural experiment based on 204 cities," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(19), pages 3069-3085, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:19:p:3069-3085
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2390131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2390131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2390131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:19:p:3069-3085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.