IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i11p1837-1852.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing barriers to smart tourism cities from a TALC perspective: a best-worst method

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Denise Escobar
  • Emanuele Gabriel Margherita

Abstract

A Smart tourism city (STC) is a smart city that includes tourism in its strategy, concurrently enhancing the quality of the tourist's experience, the quality of life for residents and mitigating urban challenges. Although the literature shows STC applications and benefits, there is a lack of studies analysing and assessing the managerial and organisational barriers to STC development for different levels of tourism development. Thus, we address this literature gap by conducting a best-worst method with 40 experts. The method allows for identifying and ranking the various STC barriers for different levels of tourism development, i.e. early and late cycles, based on the tourism area life cycle model. The consequent rankings are eventually compared. The results show seven barriers to STC development that have different rankings for the early and late cycles of tourism development. The most important barrier is the lack of a clear STC strategy for both levels of tourism development. In contrast, the least important barrier is the lack of smart infrastructure for the early cycle and the lack of smart development standards for the late cycle.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Denise Escobar & Emanuele Gabriel Margherita, 2025. "Assessing barriers to smart tourism cities from a TALC perspective: a best-worst method," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 1837-1852, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:11:p:1837-1852
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2352612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2352612
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2352612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:11:p:1837-1852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.