IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i11p1768-1786.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual reality and museum tourism in the anchoring paradigm

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuowei (Joy) Huang
  • Chaoran Lv
  • Jiang Gu
  • Lingfei Long

Abstract

The present research designed a series of two studies and examined the impacts of the additional VR tour on museum tourist behaviour, learning and satisfaction, considering tourists’ belief of technology in the anchoring paradigm. It finds that museum tourists with an additional VR tour of cultural exhibitions spend less time and show a targeted temporal–spatial pattern in the on-site visit than those without VR. The findings indicated that participants who read the poster about VR are advanced and helpful in museum visits and reported higher learning and satisfaction compared with those who did not read the poster, no matter whether they took the additional VR tour or not. This finding suggests that external anchors significantly influence and even bias people’s judgements in visitor learning and satisfaction with their visit to cultural exhibitions. This study is among the first to look into the human-technology relationship, particularly the sentiment of ‘technological optimism’ in the tourism context. Using the anchoring theory, this study investigates museum tourists’ cognitive mechanism involving their belief in technology. It is also innovative in employing interdisciplinary methods, such as spatial-temporal analysis, in-depth interviews, observations and experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuowei (Joy) Huang & Chaoran Lv & Jiang Gu & Lingfei Long, 2025. "Virtual reality and museum tourism in the anchoring paradigm," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(11), pages 1768-1786, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:11:p:1768-1786
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2349694
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2349694
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2349694?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:11:p:1768-1786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.