IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v28y2025i10p1570-1594.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What makes a better hotel selection? A hybrid approach considering tourists’ preference and review helpfulness

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Wu
  • Chao Fu
  • Erlong Zhao
  • Shaolong Sun
  • Shouyang Wang

Abstract

Hotel selection is crucial in planning trips. Several studies constructed the decision methods, which assumed that people are completely rational and neglected decision-maker’s (DM’s) behavioural aspects, based on text reviews or numerical ratings with the subjective or objective weights of criteria. Therefore, this study proposes a picture fuzzy gained and lost dominance score (PF-GLDS) method based on prospect theory, which integrates user-generated text reviews and multi-criteria ratings to facilitate hotel selection while considering tourists’ preference and review helpfulness. First, review helpfulness is analyzed to enhance data quality. Second, a decision matrix is constructed by simultaneously considering sentiment in helpful text reviews as well as multi-criteria ratings. Third, the criteria are derived by the maximising deviation and best worst methods (BWM), respectively, for tourists’ preferred objective and subjective weights. Finally, to address hotel selection problems, an extended GLDS method with picture fuzzy information, considering bounded rationality behaviour, is developed. Empirical evaluation on five hotels from the TripAdvisor website demonstrates the reasonableness and advantages of our proposed hybrid approach in achieving more objective and reliable decision making. Concurrently, this study can serve as a reference for tourists seeking well-suited hotels and tourism website optimisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Wu & Chao Fu & Erlong Zhao & Shaolong Sun & Shouyang Wang, 2025. "What makes a better hotel selection? A hybrid approach considering tourists’ preference and review helpfulness," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(10), pages 1570-1594, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:10:p:1570-1594
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2024.2343098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2024.2343098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2024.2343098?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:28:y:2025:i:10:p:1570-1594. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.