IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v27y2024i11p1834-1851.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-method study of the emotional mechanism linking seaside destination attributes and tourists’ revisit intention

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Qu
  • Wenwen Wang
  • Ruitao Han

Abstract

The advent of the post-pandemic era has increased the emotional rewards destinations need to provide. However, the psychological process of generating tourists’ revisit intention remains unclear in research on destination attributes and revisit intention. Existing research has many drawbacks, suggesting important research gaps, including using generalized mediating variables, focusing on conventional tourism scenarios, and overreliance on regression-based techniques. This study fills the gaps using multiple methods (qualitative and quantitative methods and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis) to examine the linkage between seaside destination attributes and tourists’ revisit intentions using Sanya, China, as a case study. The innovations of this study include the detailed emotional path of tourists’ revisit intention, the use of multiple methods, and the identification of the critical emotional variable. Managerial implications about marketing and service entry point are also provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Qu & Wenwen Wang & Ruitao Han, 2024. "A multi-method study of the emotional mechanism linking seaside destination attributes and tourists’ revisit intention," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 1834-1851, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:11:p:1834-1851
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2215976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2023.2215976
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2023.2215976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:27:y:2024:i:11:p:1834-1851. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.