IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v26y2023i4p511-517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating staycation intention: the influence of risk aversion, community attachment and perceived control during the pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Pichierri
  • Luca Petruzzellis
  • Pierluigi Passaro

Abstract

The tourism literature has widely investigated the effect of tourists’ risk perceptions on their travel intention, but devoted less attention to what compels tourists to take a staycation. The intense risks of the COVID-19 pandemic provide an opportunity to clarify the psychological mechanisms that drive consumers’ intentions toward such experiences. This study examines whether the risk aversion felt during the pandemic is linked to staycation intention through community attachment, and whether this effect is contingent on individuals’ perception of control over COVID-19. The results from an online questionnaire, administered to a sample of 230 Italian participants, revealed that individuals’ risk aversion positively affected their attachment toward the local community, which in turn increased their intention to take a staycation. However, this path only held when participants reported low levels of perceived control over the COVID-19 disease. The findings elucidate a possible psychological mechanism behind staycation and shed light on this form of local tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Pichierri & Luca Petruzzellis & Pierluigi Passaro, 2023. "Investigating staycation intention: the influence of risk aversion, community attachment and perceived control during the pandemic," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 511-517, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:511-517
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2069551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2022.2069551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2022.2069551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:26:y:2023:i:4:p:511-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.