IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v24y2021i13p1781-1791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does terrorism impact on the peer-to-peer accommodation market? Empirical evidence from Airbnb in Paris

Author

Listed:
  • Hsiangting Shatina Chen
  • Yuanyuan Chen
  • Yihong He

Abstract

This research note aims to understand the impact of terrorist attacks on the peer-to-peer, short-term rental (P2P-STR) market. By utilizing Parisian Airbnb data, an event study analysis was conducted to understand how the P2P-STR market performance and demand changed after a significant terrorist attack in November 2015 in Paris. The results indicate a negative and significant impact of the severe terrorist attack on the P2P-STR lodging business in Paris, both on the market demand and the rental performance. Travelers and Airbnb hosts’ risk aversion may change their behaviour after the violence happened at the travel destination.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsiangting Shatina Chen & Yuanyuan Chen & Yihong He, 2021. "Does terrorism impact on the peer-to-peer accommodation market? Empirical evidence from Airbnb in Paris," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(13), pages 1781-1791, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1781-1791
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1784105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2020.1784105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2020.1784105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:24:y:2021:i:13:p:1781-1791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.