IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcitxx/v17y2014i3p280-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impressions of Liusanjie: a study of motivation, theatrical performance evaluation, and satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Yanling Huang
  • Shengfeng Luo
  • Peiyi Ding
  • Noel Scott

Abstract

This paper examines the relationships between motivation to visit, performance evaluation, satisfaction, and behavioural intentions for tourists experiencing ‘Impressions of Liusanjie’, an iconic, outdoor, theatrical performance in Guilin, China. The study finds that motivation does not affect satisfaction directly but that performance evaluation is an intervening variable between motivation and satisfaction. It also finds that experiential evaluation of the theatrical performance has more effect on satisfaction than evaluation of technical and functional attributes. Tourists were surveyed after the performance and the results analysed using cluster, correlation analysis and structural equation modelling (SEM). The first two techniques were used to identify existing relationships amongst the study variables. SEM was applied to determine if a causal relationship existed and, if so, their strength. This research provides a contribution to the understanding of tourist motivation, theatrical performance evaluation, satisfaction, and behavioural intentions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanling Huang & Shengfeng Luo & Peiyi Ding & Noel Scott, 2014. "Impressions of Liusanjie: a study of motivation, theatrical performance evaluation, and satisfaction," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 280-296, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:17:y:2014:i:3:p:280-296
    DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2012.733355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13683500.2012.733355
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13683500.2012.733355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcitxx:v:17:y:2014:i:3:p:280-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.