IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rbalxx/v52y2021i4p521-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Political dejection in a divided society: a challenge for Latvia’s democracy?

Author

Listed:
  • Timofey Agarin
  • Ryo Nakai

Abstract

Ethnically divided societies often seek political cohesion by pursuing nationalizing policies. Latvia has had some experience of this, for example, with the notion that citizens should speak the national language and respect government institutions coincides with portrayals of ethnic minorities as a challenge to democracy. The focus on nation-state building has resulted in persistently low levels of political engagement and public confidence among the citizenry. Public survey data shows that many voters believe their concerns have been neglected by elected representatives, who have fixed their attention on ethnopolitical issues. While we see no demonstrable correlation between ethnicity and levels of political dejection, ethnonational politics explains unstable voter-representative relations and electoral volatility during the Saeima elections from 2010–2018. These unanticipated effects of nation-state building on Latvia’s electoral politics invite a rethinking of the relationship between voters and their elected representatives in democratically consolidated, yet divided nations.

Suggested Citation

  • Timofey Agarin & Ryo Nakai, 2021. "Political dejection in a divided society: a challenge for Latvia’s democracy?," Journal of Baltic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(4), pages 521-546, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rbalxx:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:521-546
    DOI: 10.1080/01629778.2021.1968917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01629778.2021.1968917
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01629778.2021.1968917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rbalxx:v:52:y:2021:i:4:p:521-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rbal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.