IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rapaxx/v48y2026i2p169-193.html

Citizens’ trust in public institutions in the global South: empirical evidence from Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Rifat Mahmud

Abstract

Trust signals the effectiveness of governance by reflecting citizen confidence in public institutions. This article examines reported trust in civil service and local government, aggregated as public administration, across Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka, using nationally representative Governance and Trust data from 2020–2021 (n = 6240; 2740 in Bangladesh; 2256 in Nepal, and 1244 in Sri Lanka). The findings reveal high levels of trust despite widespread perceptions of corruption, which challenges dominant Global North assumptions that corruption undermines trust. Although corruption remains endemic, regression analysis shows that it does not positively predict citizen trust. This paradox reflects the region’s social orientation, characterised by an authoritarian culture that fosters obedience and loyalty. Citizens also face heavy administrative burdens, including onerous rules and processes. Additionally, given the oppressive governance context in these countries, citizens may overestimate the government’s actions out of fear of harassment. Importantly, as the data predate Sri Lanka’s 2022 and Bangladesh’s 2024 uprisings, this article interprets such trust as conditional, fragile, and likely to collapse when fairness norms weaken or repression intensifies.

Suggested Citation

  • Rifat Mahmud, 2026. "Citizens’ trust in public institutions in the global South: empirical evidence from Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 169-193, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:169-193
    DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2026.2615440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2026.2615440
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23276665.2026.2615440?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:48:y:2026:i:2:p:169-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.