IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rapaxx/v44y2022i3p249-270.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Serving society vs. the individual user? Experimental evidence on the role of public service motivation in predicting job-task preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Breaugh
  • Guillem Ripoll

Abstract

Although the term public service motivation (PSM) was coined 30 years ago, its theoretical development is still ongoing. One of these debates examines how to differentiate it from likeminded concepts. Recent theoretical development related to PSM focus on the salience of giving back to society, or non-identified beneficiaries, in contrast to individual users. To assess this distinction, empirical research is essential. Using a between-subjects vignette experiment among a representative sample of 1512 citizens in Catalonia (Spain), we test whether PSM can predict task preferences depending on the extent to which they are oriented to non-identified and identified beneficiaries. This article demonstrates that PSM is mainly oriented to society at large rather than individual users. The findings present evidence to confirm emerging PSM conceptualisations as well as highlight important implications for research and practice – especially with respect to public service job design.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Breaugh & Guillem Ripoll, 2022. "Serving society vs. the individual user? Experimental evidence on the role of public service motivation in predicting job-task preferences," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 249-270, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:44:y:2022:i:3:p:249-270
    DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2022.2047749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2022.2047749
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23276665.2022.2047749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:44:y:2022:i:3:p:249-270. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.