IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rapaxx/v44y2022i1p81-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy experimentation with impact financing: a systematic review of research on social impact bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Tima T. Moldogaziev
  • Cheol Liu
  • Mikhail Ivonchyk

Abstract

Social impact bonds (SIB) have become a novel and attractive policy tool to assist with service delivery to vulnerable groups. Since the first SIB in 2010 in the United Kingdom, hundreds of projects have been adopted, implemented, and continue to be developed around the world. A broad observation from current research concludes that there is a lack of consistent evidence on research foci and orientations with regard to this innovative policy tool. In the context of the Asia-Pacific region, research on SIBs is largely non-existent. Moreover, research from Asia-Pacific contexts is primarily focused on the (financial) product features of impact financing, at the expense of studying the process innovation aspect of SIBs in service delivery. This contrasts with research from European and North American SIBs, which exhibit a relatively heightened interest on issues in service delivery process and their impact on performance measurement, evidence auditing and evaluation, and accountability to service recipients versus investor returns. As policy experimentation continues with SIBs in the Asia-Pacific region, several key considerations remain vital and require future scholarly attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Tima T. Moldogaziev & Cheol Liu & Mikhail Ivonchyk, 2022. "Policy experimentation with impact financing: a systematic review of research on social impact bonds," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 81-99, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:81-99
    DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2021.2019070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2021.2019070
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23276665.2021.2019070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:44:y:2022:i:1:p:81-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.