IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rapaxx/v42y2020i4p262-273.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing civil service capability: emergence of the professions model

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Bartlett

Abstract

In the last thirty years, the dominant approach in Australian public sector organisation has been one of devolution with an emphasis on management at the agency level. This has delivered benefits in terms of public service responsiveness to ministers and stakeholders and a more diverse set of approaches that are tailored to the circumstances confronting individual agencies. However, a number of reviews, including the recent Independent Review of the Australian Public Service (the Thodey Review), have highlighted the limitations of this approach and the constraints it has placed on the ability of the public service to respond effectively to broader challenges and to leverage skills across agency boundaries. The professions model is an approach that seeks to emphasise the continuity of practice across agency boundaries in various job families. A number of countries have tried the professions approach as a way to address a perceived lack of consistency and effectiveness across their collective public services. This article describes international trends associated with the professions model and describes the approach to implementing digital and human resources professions models in the Australian Public Service.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Bartlett, 2020. "Enhancing civil service capability: emergence of the professions model," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 262-273, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:42:y:2020:i:4:p:262-273
    DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2020.1787184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2020.1787184
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23276665.2020.1787184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:42:y:2020:i:4:p:262-273. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.