IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rapaxx/v40y2018i2p83-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Donor policy domains in official development assistance: ideas, actors and rules in and beyond Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Joanna Spratt

Abstract

This article appreciates that official development assistance (ODA) policy is a complex area of a donor country’s policy-making, within a broader foreign policy domain. The literature on ODA policy-making does not have a common analytical approach, with discussions of specific amounts of aid existing alongside those of it as an aggregated phenomena. Policy scholars are especially interested in exploring policy content, delineating goals, objectives and settings, and identifying actors, ideas and rules that are prevalent in any particular policy area. Applying thinking from policy studies to an analysis of ODA policy highlights significant characteristics, ideas, actors and rules that comprise the ODA policy domain. This approach is useful concerning both long-term traditional Western donors and newer or rising donors, including Asian donors. It facititates a description of the ODA policy domain, which scholars and advocates can use to develop a comprehensive understanding of any individual donor’s ODA policy. It can improve knowledge and action about ODA policy, and potentially lead to greater sustainable development outcomes in countries that receive ODA.

Suggested Citation

  • Joanna Spratt, 2018. "Donor policy domains in official development assistance: ideas, actors and rules in and beyond Asia," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(2), pages 83-97, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:40:y:2018:i:2:p:83-97
    DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2018.1477501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2018.1477501
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23276665.2018.1477501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benjamin Day & Tamas Wells, 2021. "What parliamentarians think about Australia's post‐COVID‐19 aid program: The emerging ‘cautious consensus’ in Australian aid," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(3), pages 384-400, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:40:y:2018:i:2:p:83-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.