IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rapaxx/v38y2016i2p103-117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Municipal relationship modifications by the Great Heisei Consolidation in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Noda

Abstract

In Japan, the Great Heisei Consolidation has facilitated municipal mergers for economies of scale and drastically reduced the number of municipalities since 2000.This phase of merger promotion ended in 2010. The central government’s strongest focus was on encouraging mergers in areas where many municipalities each had a population of less than 10,000. An analysis of the “metropolitan power diffusion index” (MPDI) and “move resources” shows that, although half of the areas achieved good modifications, mergers do not always improve financial efficiency. However, the more striking result is that municipalities in prefectures that resisted the central government’s consolidation incentives, especially Hokkaido where there are many small municipalities, continued to receive the benefit of local allocation tax revenue redistribution from the central government due to their relatively disadvantaged fiscal status. By contrast, the benefits of well-modified municipalities that followed the recommendations of central government policy and achieved good outcomes were reduced and financial exemption was cut. Thus, the central government’s use of accelerated and restrictive approaches to incentivise consolidation was limited by its ongoing willingness to bail out needy municipalities that did not accept with national policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Noda, 2016. "Municipal relationship modifications by the Great Heisei Consolidation in Japan," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 103-117, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:38:y:2016:i:2:p:103-117
    DOI: 10.1080/23276665.2016.1179857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/23276665.2016.1179857
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/23276665.2016.1179857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rapaxx:v:38:y:2016:i:2:p:103-117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAPA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.