IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rajsxx/v17y2025i7p979-993.html

Financial and economic viability of cassava peeling technology and constraints to adoption in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa
  • Michael Kwame Asempah
  • Mamudu Abunga Akudugu
  • Emmanuel Abokyi
  • Dadson Awunyo-Vitor

Abstract

The manual peeling of cassava is laborious, prone to injuries, and limits processing speed, contributing to postharvest losses due to cassava’s highly perishable nature. To address this challenge, this study aims to evaluate the financial and economic viability of installing cassava peeling machines and the key constraints to their adoption among small-scale processors. Primary data were collected from a random sample of 300 cassava processors, and the analysis employed both discounted and undiscounted measures of project worth, the Garrett Ranking Technique, and Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance. The results show that installation of the cassava peeling machine is financially viable, with a Net Present Value (NPV) of GH₵229,870.00, a Benefit–Cost Ratio (BCR) of 1.61, an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 27%, and a payback period of 4.3 years. Similarly, economic viability was confirmed with an NPV of GH₵132,950.00, a BCR of 1.4, an IRR of 26%, and a payback period of 3.8 years. High initial investment cost emerged as the major constraint. Policy interventions should therefore prioritize reducing entry costs through public-private partnerships. This study contributes by bridging engineering innovation with economic adoption analysis, offering empirical evidence to guide technology diffusion in rural agro-processing.

Suggested Citation

  • Camillus Abawiera Wongnaa & Michael Kwame Asempah & Mamudu Abunga Akudugu & Emmanuel Abokyi & Dadson Awunyo-Vitor, 2025. "Financial and economic viability of cassava peeling technology and constraints to adoption in Ghana," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(7), pages 979-993, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:979-993
    DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2025.2577550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20421338.2025.2577550
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20421338.2025.2577550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:979-993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.