IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rajsxx/v15y2023i6p671-677.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managers’ perception of ethics in public entities and service delivery using the corporate virtue scale

Author

Listed:
  • Priviledge Cheteni
  • Emmanuel Selemani Shindika

Abstract

Ethical culture is the epitome of the success of various organizations and a prerequisite for progress. This study aimed to examine the construct validity of the Corporate Virtue Scale (CEV) and find if there is any association between ethical culture and its impact on employees’ wellbeing. The sample was composed of 277 managers from various government entities in the Buffalo Municipality in South Africa. A confirmatory factor analysis was used to validate the eight-factor CEV scale. The employees’ perceptions of ethical culture in public entities were associated with their stress levels and emotional exhaustion. Thus, the findings of this study revealed that the ethical culture of organizations plays a huge role in the wellbeing of employees. The study concludes that the CEV scale is a proven instrument with construct validity. The recommendation is that the government should focus on simplifying rules and procedures that help to cultivate an ethical culture within public entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Priviledge Cheteni & Emmanuel Selemani Shindika, 2023. "Managers’ perception of ethics in public entities and service delivery using the corporate virtue scale," African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 671-677, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:671-677
    DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2023.2176622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20421338.2023.2176622
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20421338.2023.2176622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rajsxx:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:671-677. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rajs .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.