Author
Listed:
- Xiayin Lou
- Peng Luo
- Liqiu Meng
Abstract
Spatial prediction is a fundamental task in geography, providing essential data support for various scenarios. Recent advancements, empowered by the development of geospatial artificial intelligence (GeoAI), have primarily focused on improving prediction accuracy while overlooking reliable measurements of prediction uncertainty. Such measures are crucial for enhancing model trustworthiness and supporting responsible decision-making. To address this issue, we propose a model-agnostic uncertainty assessment method called GeoConformal Prediction (GeoCP). First, a simulation study is conducted to validate the usefulness of GeoCP. Then, we applied GeoCP to two classic spatial prediction cases, spatial regression and spatial interpolation, to evaluate its reliability. For the case of spatial regression, we used XGBoost to predict housing prices, followed by GeoCP to calculate uncertainty. Our results show that GeoCP achieved a coverage rate of 93.67 percent, whereas bootstrapping methods reached a maximum coverage of 81.00 percent after 2,000 runs. We then applied GeoCP for the case of spatial interpolation models. By comparing a GeoAI-based geostatistical model with a traditional geostatistical model (Kriging), we found that the uncertainty obtained from GeoCP aligned closely with the variance in Kriging. Finally, using GeoCP, we analyzed the sources of uncertainty in spatial prediction. We found that explicitly including local features in AI models can significantly reduce prediction uncertainty, especially in areas with strong local dependence. Our findings suggest that GeoCP holds substantial potential not only for geographic knowledge discovery but also for guiding the design of future GeoAI models, paving the way for more reliable and interpretable spatial prediction frameworks. The method is implemented in an open-source Python package named geoconformal.
Suggested Citation
Xiayin Lou & Peng Luo & Liqiu Meng, 2025.
"GeoConformal Prediction: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Measuring the Uncertainty of Spatial Prediction,"
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 115(8), pages 1971-1998, September.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:115:y:2025:i:8:p:1971-1998
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2025.2516091
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:115:y:2025:i:8:p:1971-1998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.