IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v112y2022i6p1812-1832.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating an Aggregate Mine Proposal Using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Philpot
  • Keith W. Hipel

Abstract

Aggregates are critical resources for infrastructure and development, but mining operations can be disruptive to nearby communities. We examine a conflict arising in response to a proposed aggregate mine in the Region of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Drawing on participant observation, interviews, and a review of publicly available materials related to the conflict, we gain insight into the regulatory constraints and decision makers driving this conflict. We then model the ongoing conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution. A set of conflict models developed as part of in-depth sensitivity analysis are described and analyzed. Individually, the models capture possible preferences of different decision makers. A comparison of model results reflects the dominance of provincial authority in aggregate mining decisions and adds clarity to the influence of different decision makers. These models provide a basis for conducting future advanced analyses of decision-maker motivations, perceptions, and strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Philpot & Keith W. Hipel, 2022. "Investigating an Aggregate Mine Proposal Using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(6), pages 1812-1832, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:6:p:1812-1832
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.1994850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2021.1994850
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2021.1994850?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:6:p:1812-1832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.