IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raagxx/v112y2022i6p1633-1648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apostasy of an “Anti-Assessment” Curmudgeon: Developing a Geographic Concept Inventory for Assessing Program-Level Learning Outcomes in a Department of Geography

Author

Listed:
  • Paul C. Sutton
  • Xuantong Wang
  • Bingxin Qi

Abstract

Apostasy is defined as the abandonment or renunciation of a religious or political belief. This article describes the apostasy of a professor of geography with respect to their initial hostility toward the utility of learning outcomes assessments. This apostasy motivated the development of assessment instruments that could provide evidence that graduating geography and environmental science majors possessed more skills and knowledge and confidence in their skills and knowledge than they did as incoming first-year students. The instruments we developed for learning outcomes assessment are described and presented. Qualitative and statistical analyses of several years of data demonstrate statistically significant improvements in the objective quizzes and self-assessments of the graduating students. The results provided a satisfying body of evidence suggesting that the teaching and learning taking place in our department are effective while also identifying some issues we need to address. These data provide a mechanism for the faculty to reflect on our curriculum and teaching practices to identify ways to improve them. These instruments are used on an on-going basis to inform departmental program reviews, to field inquiries from accreditation teams, and to promote the department within the university.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul C. Sutton & Xuantong Wang & Bingxin Qi, 2022. "Apostasy of an “Anti-Assessment” Curmudgeon: Developing a Geographic Concept Inventory for Assessing Program-Level Learning Outcomes in a Department of Geography," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(6), pages 1633-1648, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:6:p:1633-1648
    DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2021.2008861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24694452.2021.2008861
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24694452.2021.2008861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:112:y:2022:i:6:p:1633-1648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.