Author
Listed:
- Katherine D. Dearborn
- Ryan K. Danby
Abstract
The response of vegetation to recent climate change is a central theme in contemporary biogeography. A tenet of this research is that forests will advance upslope and northward as climate warms, replacing tundra communities. There has been considerable variation, however, in the pace and extent of recent change, particularly in alpine regions. The objectives of this study were to determine how and why tree spatial patterns vary across different topographic features, and to use spatial patterns to infer the mechanisms governing treeline dynamics in an alpine region of subarctic Canada. We mapped trees across different elevations, slope aspects, and slope angles in two QuickBird satellite images, and in field plots established within the bounds of each image. We then quantified the degree of clustering among trees using Ripley’s K(t) statistic. We also classified each image into vegetation classes and used class-level landscape metrics to quantify the degree of treeline abruptness in different topographic settings. We found that clustering of stems was more common on south than north aspects, likely due to the high occurrence of overwinter damage on the former. Treelines were also more abrupt on south aspects, likely because high tall shrub abundance on these slopes inhibits tree seedling establishment. We conclude that the spatial patterns of subarctic alpine treelines are strongly influenced by both physical and biological factors that vary strongly with slope aspect. The response of treelines to future climate change will likely be highly variable at the landscape scale, despite experiencing similar climatic conditions. Key Words: forest–tundra ecotone, FragStats, landscape metrics, QuickBird, spatial pattern analysis, Yukon.
Suggested Citation
Katherine D. Dearborn & Ryan K. Danby, 2020.
"Spatial Analysis of Forest–Tundra Ecotones Reveals the Influence of Topography and Vegetation on Alpine Treeline Patterns in the Subarctic,"
Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(1), pages 18-35, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:110:y:2020:i:1:p:18-35
DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1616530
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raagxx:v:110:y:2020:i:1:p:18-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raag .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.