IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raaexx/v32y2025i2p358-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fintech and tax revenues: does political institution matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Olusegun Vincent
  • Olaniyi Evans

Abstract

The study investigates the effect of fintech on tax revenues while empirically measuring the moderating effects of political institutions. Using the iterated GMM estimator, the study utilises a sample of 24 low and middle-income countries and a dataset spanning 2013 to 2021. The findings indicate that the advancement of fintech considerably benefits tax revenues, meaning that fintech, in the form of technology integration into taxation, can be a valuable tool for efficient tax collection and administration. The research also shows that political institutions positively affect tax revenues, implying that sound political institutions are indispensable for increased tax revenues. Most interestingly, the empirical findings provide evidence of the positive moderating effects of political institutions on the nexus between fintech and tax revenues, which suggests that the improvement in political institutions fosters the significant positive effect of fintech on tax revenues in these countries. The governments and policymakers of these countries can boost tax revenues through, on one hand, fintech development and, on the other hand, solid political institutions that support fintech development.

Suggested Citation

  • Olusegun Vincent & Olaniyi Evans, 2025. "Fintech and tax revenues: does political institution matter?," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 358-376, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:358-376
    DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2024.2356106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/16081625.2024.2356106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/16081625.2024.2356106?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:32:y:2025:i:2:p:358-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raae20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.