IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/raaexx/v29y2022i5p1227-1246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Board reforms and audit fees: international evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Huang
  • Xiao Li
  • Zilong Song

Abstract

With a difference-in-differences approach, we find that world-wide reforms result in higher audit fees for reform firms. And this is specially so for reforms involving components of director independence and/or audit committee and auditor independence, adopting the rule-based approach, and implemented in countries with weaker institutional quality. Further analysis reveals that the increase in audit fees is driven by the increase in auditors’ efforts and auditees’ litigation risk, while the improved financial reporting quality has a negative effect on audit fees. Overall, our study examines one compliance cost, as well as its variations, of the board reforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Huang & Xiao Li & Zilong Song, 2022. "Board reforms and audit fees: international evidence," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(5), pages 1227-1246, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1227-1246
    DOI: 10.1080/16081625.2020.1870510
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/16081625.2020.1870510
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/16081625.2020.1870510?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minfeng Yu & Yi Si & Gaoliang Tian & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Climate risk and audit fees: An international study," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 4989-5025, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:raaexx:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1227-1246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/raae20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.