IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v26y2026i1p119-136.html

Feature configuration effects in DRL portfolio management: a risk-focused evaluation under market stress

Author

Listed:
  • Rayan Ayari

Abstract

This study investigates whether deep reinforcement learning (DRL) agents can effectively use financial feature information for risk-aware portfolio management. We design a controlled experimental framework that compares four feature configurations: BARRA-derived systematic risk information, technical indicators, their combination, and a no-feature baseline. Using the Twin Delayed Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (TD3) algorithm across 800 independently trained agents on randomly sampled 30-stock S&P 500 portfolios, we evaluate out-of-sample performance during the volatile 2022 market and assess statistical significance via paired permutation tests. The BARRA-derived information provides significant downside protection, improving maximum drawdown by 0.71% (p = 0.02) relative to the baseline, while technical indicators do not offer significant benefit alone or in combination. These results indicate that DRL agents can leverage systematic risk information to manage tail risk, and that targeted feature selection based on financial theory may be more effective than indiscriminate feature augmentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Rayan Ayari, 2026. "Feature configuration effects in DRL portfolio management: a risk-focused evaluation under market stress," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 119-136, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:26:y:2026:i:1:p:119-136
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2025.2592822
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2025.2592822
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2025.2592822?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:26:y:2026:i:1:p:119-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.