IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v25y2025i8p1333-1341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian probability of default models with Langevin dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Conti
  • Giacomo Morelli

Abstract

Using machine learning to estimate the probability of default in credit risk is becoming a popular approach. Bayesian methodologies offer a probabilistic interpretation of model predictions and prevent overfitting, a significant flaw in numerous machine learning models. However, Bayesian inference based on Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) algorithms comes with high computational costs. For credit scoring models efficiency and performance are equally important features. We propose two machine learning architectures based on Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamics (SGLD) to estimate the probability of default of loan applicants. This framework (i) allows us to sample from the true posterior without relying on typical MCMC algorithms, (ii) it is not computationally expensive and (iii) it leverages the strength of Bayesian approaches, such as the flexibility to regularization. We apply this method to Bayesian Logistic Regression and Bayesian Neural Network. Furthermore, we perform a benchmarking analysis with different models and regularization techniques on four large retail loan datasets. We also address model explainability with the model-agnostic method of Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP).

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Conti & Giacomo Morelli, 2025. "Bayesian probability of default models with Langevin dynamics," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 1333-1341, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:25:y:2025:i:8:p:1333-1341
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2025.2532025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2025.2532025
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2025.2532025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:25:y:2025:i:8:p:1333-1341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.