IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v21y2021i11p1905-1919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Structural breaks in Box-Cox transforms of realized volatility: a model selection perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Behrendt

Abstract

Autoregressive (AR) models such as the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model capture the linear footprint inherent in realized volatility. We draw upon the fact that the HAR model is a constrained AR model and cast the problem of estimating structural breaks in the autoregressive volatility dynamics as a model selection problem. A two-step Lasso-type procedure is used to consistently estimate the unknown number and timing of structural breaks. Empirically, we find the number of breaks to be heavily influenced by Box-Cox transformations applied to realized volatility series of eight stock market indices: For example, while we find breaks in the original series, no breaks are found in log-realized volatility, a measure often used in applied research, across a wide range of lag lengths. These Box-Cox transformations lead to different volatility processes with distinct autoregressive dynamics and affect the estimation of structural breaks. Importantly, the log-transformation considerably reduces the number of price jumps which might otherwise be selected as structural breaks.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Behrendt, 2021. "Structural breaks in Box-Cox transforms of realized volatility: a model selection perspective," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1905-1919, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:21:y:2021:i:11:p:1905-1919
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2021.1914855
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2021.1914855
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2021.1914855?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:21:y:2021:i:11:p:1905-1919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.