IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/quantf/v11y2011i9p1301-1313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Randomized structural models of credit spreads

Author

Listed:
  • Chuang Yi
  • Alexander Tchernitser
  • Tom Hurd

Abstract

We propose to randomize the initial condition of a generalized structural model, where the solvency ratio instead of the asset value is modeled explicitly. This initial randomization assumption is motivated by the fact that market players cannot observe the solvency ratio accurately. We find that positive short spreads can be produced due to imperfect observation of the risk factor. The two models we have considered, the Randomized Merton (RM) and the Randomized Black--Cox (RBC) models, both have explicit expressions for the Probability of Default (PD) and Credit Spreads (CS). In the RM model, both PD and LGD are found to be of order , as the maturity T approaches zero. It therefore provides an example that has no well-defined default intensity but still admits positive short spreads. In the RBC model, the positive short spread is generated through the positive default intensity of the model. Because explicit formulas are available, these two Randomized Structure (RS) models are easily implemented and calibrated to market data. This is illustrated by a calibration exercise on Credit Default Swap (CDS) spread data of the Ford Motor Corporation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuang Yi & Alexander Tchernitser & Tom Hurd, 2011. "Randomized structural models of credit spreads," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(9), pages 1301-1313, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:11:y:2011:i:9:p:1301-1313
    DOI: 10.1080/14697688.2010.507213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14697688.2010.507213
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14697688.2010.507213?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:quantf:v:11:y:2011:i:9:p:1301-1313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RQUF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.