IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v46y2026i3p313-323.html

Using different types of performance information: implications for hybrid professionals’ decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca De Domenico
  • Guido Noto
  • Nicola Bellè
  • Milena Vainieri

Abstract

The study provides valuable insights for public sector managers across different domains, with a particular focus on those operating in professional bureaucracies. While the empirical analysis concentrates on hybrid professionals in healthcare organizations, the findings are broadly applicable to all public service contexts where performance information from service users is becoming increasingly relevant. The article highlights a growing openness among professionals to integrate both financial and user-reported information into their decision-making processes. In the healthcare sector, this refers specifically to patient-reported measures, but the logic extends to any public service where users’ experiences and outcomes can inform performance management. Public managers should rethink how performance systems are designed and implemented to better incorporate the perspectives of service users. Doing so would enhance transparency, responsiveness, and strategic alignment, leading to more effective and person-centred public services. This research supports evidence-based innovation in performance management (PM) practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca De Domenico & Guido Noto & Nicola Bellè & Milena Vainieri, 2026. "Using different types of performance information: implications for hybrid professionals’ decision-making," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 313-323, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:46:y:2026:i:3:p:313-323
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2537309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2025.2537309
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2025.2537309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:46:y:2026:i:3:p:313-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.