IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v46y2026i3p284-293.html

Social impact measurement as a ‘public value guarantee’ in public–private partnerships? Evidence from a realist evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Tommaso Tropeano
  • Enrico Bellazzecca
  • Irene Bengo

Abstract

The article speaks directly to policy-makers, local public administrations and municipalities responsible for implementing public–private partnerships (PPPs), non-profit organizations engaged in social missions, impact investors, and traditional private sector partners. It offers policy-makers and practitioners insights into how different social impact measurement (SIM) characteristics can be employed in PPPs. By examining the relational challenges that public and private actors face in collaborative efforts and the potential solutions offered by SIM practices, this research enriches the discourse on inter-sectoral collaboration theory and practice. The findings underscore the significance of aligning public and private actors to not only achieve economic efficiency but also generate substantial social impact. As PPPs continue to be instrumental in addressing grand challenges and mission-oriented policies, understanding how to incorporate SIM is imperative for sustainable and value-driven collaborations between public and private sector. By addressing these issues, the authors contribute to the ongoing dialogue on enhancing the efficacy of PPPs for mission-oriented policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tommaso Tropeano & Enrico Bellazzecca & Irene Bengo, 2026. "Social impact measurement as a ‘public value guarantee’ in public–private partnerships? Evidence from a realist evaluation," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 284-293, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:46:y:2026:i:3:p:284-293
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2025.2499079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2025.2499079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2025.2499079?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:46:y:2026:i:3:p:284-293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.