IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v46y2026i2p232-236.html

New development: Understanding the relationship between public sector consulting and public value destruction—An epistemic learning perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Bishoy L. Zaki
  • Ben Suykens
  • Inez Catala

Abstract

Attempts to professionalize public service delivery have resulted in the proliferation of private consultants in the public sector with the aim of increasing public value. With the majority of research focusing on the determinants of public sector consultants’ performance outcomes, few have analysed the relationship between public sector consulting and public value—especially public value destruction. The authors address this gap by theoretically positioning public sector consulting as an epistemic learning process. A new framework is developed that distinguishes between non-deliberate failures (value destruction by omission), and deliberate deontological failures (value destruction by commission) across different approaches to public value. Several strategies are outlined for practitioners—policy-makers and civil servants—to better administer public sector consulting as a learning process.

Suggested Citation

  • Bishoy L. Zaki & Ben Suykens & Inez Catala, 2026. "New development: Understanding the relationship between public sector consulting and public value destruction—An epistemic learning perspective," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 232-236, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:46:y:2026:i:2:p:232-236
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2024.2343806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2024.2343806
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2024.2343806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:46:y:2026:i:2:p:232-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.