IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v45y2025i5p456-465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Justine Marienfeldt
  • Liz Marla Wehmeier
  • Sabine Kuhlmann

Abstract

Investigating two major digitalization projects in Germany, the authors conclude that to fully utilize the potential of digitalization, old processes should be replaced with newly-designed and optimized digital ones (displacement) instead of layering new digital tools on top of analogue ones. Digitalization should be an opportunity for public sector managers and policy-makers to adjust administrative processes and structures. To implement such changes, top-down approaches are expected to contribute more effectively than bottom-up approaches to the standardization of processes and outcomes. However, this may also create challenges regarding adaptation to local needs, acceptance, and the risk of resistance to change. To guarantee effective and efficient digitalization processes and locally matching, well-accepted solutions, policy-makers in multi-level contexts are advised to strive for a well-calibrated digitalization approach, potentially consolidating digitalization efforts. Bundling certain tasks related to the provision of digital services can help to reduce the pressure on the local level.

Suggested Citation

  • Justine Marienfeldt & Liz Marla Wehmeier & Sabine Kuhlmann, 2025. "Top-down or bottom-up digital transformation? A comparison of institutional changes and outcomes," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 456-465, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:456-465
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2024.2365351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2024.2365351
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2024.2365351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:45:y:2025:i:5:p:456-465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.