IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v44y2024i3p271-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New development: From blanket coverage to patchwork quilt—rethinking organizational responses to fraud in the National Health Service in England

Author

Listed:
  • Cerian Griffiths
  • Alan Doig
  • Jackie Harvey
  • Katie Benson
  • Nicholas Lord

Abstract

This article will be of value to those working across the National Health Service (NHS) and particularly to those engaged in counter fraud activities across the public sector. As well as having national value, this article will be of international relevance as it speaks to the responsible guardianship of public funds. This article evidences the ways in which counter fraud services across the NHS in England are disjointed and some of the causes for such disjointedness. Official reports estimate that at least £1.2 billion, approximately 1% of the NHS budget, is annually lost to fraud. At a time when the NHS is facing unprecedented demand on its resources due to austerity policies, Brexit and the global pandemic, and with no clear indication of significant additional investment, any loss of NHS funds could have significant impact on patient care and so a better understanding of counter fraud responses in the NHS is potentially pivotal to future responsible handling of public money.

Suggested Citation

  • Cerian Griffiths & Alan Doig & Jackie Harvey & Katie Benson & Nicholas Lord, 2024. "New development: From blanket coverage to patchwork quilt—rethinking organizational responses to fraud in the National Health Service in England," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 271-275, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:44:y:2024:i:3:p:271-275
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2023.2270175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2023.2270175
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2023.2270175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:44:y:2024:i:3:p:271-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.