IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v40y2020i1p14-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leading the combined authorities in England: a new future for elected mayors?

Author

Listed:
  • John Fenwick
  • Lorraine Johnston

Abstract

This paper examines the initial experience of directly-elected mayors in the new combined authorities established in England. Do they have an innovative strategic leadership role for sub-national areas and provide a vehicle for effective public engagement, representing a new start for the hitherto faltering progress of the elected mayoral initiative? Alternatively, are the combined authority mayors just another policy failure in the uneven process of local government reform?Central government has created the office of directly-elected mayor and local government has to live with the consequences for good or ill. This paper deals with the role of directly-elected mayors for the combined authorities, raising questions about the effective leadership of sub-national areas of England. The new mayors may require a ‘boldness’ to work across the boundaries of bureaucratic organizations and to engage with external partners and they enjoy some limited additional resources. Central government explicitly expects the combined authority mayor to exercise their greater powers more efficiently than traditional council leaders. Yet such mayors may lack public endorsement or any degree of active public interest and may ultimately reflect government obsession with structures rather than human agency in reforming local governance.

Suggested Citation

  • John Fenwick & Lorraine Johnston, 2020. "Leading the combined authorities in England: a new future for elected mayors?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 14-20, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:14-20
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1622344
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2019.1622344
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2019.1622344?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:40:y:2020:i:1:p:14-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.