IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v39y2019i8p553-559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Citizens, technology and the NPM movement

Author

Listed:
  • Irvine Lapsley
  • Federica Segato

Abstract

In the modernization of the state, NPM ideas are presumed to offer governments certainty in the face of major unknowns. The reliance of NPM on information technologies is presented by governments as underlining this potential for certainty. However, this presumption of certainty is elusive in practice. Government pursuit of NPM transformational policies aims to make efficiency savings and cost reductions, but this may create new uncertainties for citizens, particularly because of the unintended consequences of the implementation of new forms of technology.The findings of this paper should alert citizens to the dangers of government transformation programmes which rely on IT. These may not operate as intended and foster a surveillance society which may become irreversible. For policy-makers, there is an urgent need to carefully evaluate policy proposals. There is a temptation to pursue information technology as the way more is delivered for less. But this ignores serial IT project failures and reveals a lack of awareness of the implications of sleep-walking into a surveillance society. Also, in devising transformation programmes for public services, it is important that policies do not lose sight of the entitlements and rights of citizens. The policy option of treating citizens as customers fails to comprehend what citizenship means.

Suggested Citation

  • Irvine Lapsley & Federica Segato, 2019. "Citizens, technology and the NPM movement," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(8), pages 553-559, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:39:y:2019:i:8:p:553-559
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1617539
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2019.1617539
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2019.1617539?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:39:y:2019:i:8:p:553-559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.