IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v37y2017i2p97-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To austerity and beyond! Third sector innovation or creeping privatization of public sector services?

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Myers

Abstract

The shift of services out of state provision has been revitalized through a wave of policies linked to helping people make informed choices about health and social care and to extend competition and choice. This paper considers the rise of social enterprise and public service mutuals in the UK in the landscape of austerity, public sector rationalization, and re-structuring and draws on examples to demonstrate emerging alternative delivery models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Myers, 2017. "To austerity and beyond! Third sector innovation or creeping privatization of public sector services?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 97-104, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:97-104
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2016.1266152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2016.1266152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2016.1266152?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nick Clifton & Khine S. Kyaw & Zheng Liu & Gary Walpole, 2024. "An Empirical Study on Public Sector versus Third Sector Circular Economy-Oriented Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Tania Arrieta, 2022. "Austerity in the United Kingdom and its legacy: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(2), pages 238-255, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:37:y:2017:i:2:p:97-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.