IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v34y2014i6p389-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents and outcomes relating to public and private nurses' use of intuition in England

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew J. Xerri
  • Rod Farr-Wharton
  • Yvonne Brunetto
  • Kate Shacklock
  • Fiona Robson

Abstract

This paper examines public and private sector nurses' use of intuition in England using structural equation modeling. Leader-member exchange (LMX) and perceived organizational support (POS) correlated positively with nurses' perception of discretionary power and use of intuition. Nurses' perception of discretionary power and use of intuition were positively correlated with their engagement. Further, differences were identified between private sector and public sector nurses in relation to the impact of workplace relationships (POS and LMX) and intuition onto perceived discretionary power and employee engagement. The results are important for all hospital managers seeking to foster employees' use of intuition, perception of discretionary power, and engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew J. Xerri & Rod Farr-Wharton & Yvonne Brunetto & Kate Shacklock & Fiona Robson, 2014. "Antecedents and outcomes relating to public and private nurses' use of intuition in England," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 389-396, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:34:y:2014:i:6:p:389-396
    DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2014.962363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09540962.2014.962363
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09540962.2014.962363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:34:y:2014:i:6:p:389-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.