IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pubmmg/v23y2003i1p67-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do We Have a Redundant Set of Cost-Efficiency Targets in the NHS?

Author

Listed:
  • Diane Dawson
  • Rowena Jacobs

Abstract

There has been a long history of hospital trust cost-efficiency targets being used in the National Health Service (NHS), but there is little evidence about whether they are effective in reducing hospital unit costs and reducing the dispersion of unit costs between trusts. In 1997, the new Labour government announced that it would replace the purchaser efficiency index with a new approach to securing cost-efficiency gains from trusts. Since 1999/2000 trust efficiency targets have been based on reference costs. This article presents evidence to suggest that efficiency targets have not been effective and that the new reference cost based system of targets is irrelevant. The efficiency gains that trusts seek to achieve are those that emerge from the purchaser funding formula and the contracting process.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane Dawson & Rowena Jacobs, 2003. "Do We Have a Redundant Set of Cost-Efficiency Targets in the NHS?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 67-71, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:67-71
    DOI: 10.1111/1467-9302.00343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1467-9302.00343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1467-9302.00343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pubmmg:v:23:y:2003:i:1:p:67-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPMM20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.