IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v38y2026i5p516-542.html

Green on paper, red in risk: the default consequences of corporate greenwashing

Author

Listed:
  • Jia Meng
  • Noman Waheed
  • Khalil Hussain

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of corporate greenwashing on default risk among Chinese A-share listed firms from 2009 to 2023. Using Merton’s Distance to Default model, we find a significant negative relationship between greenwashing and financial stability, indicating that firms engaging in greenwashing face elevated default risk. This relationship is amplified in highly competitive markets, where external scrutiny and stakeholder pressure are intensified. In contrast, greater gender diversity on corporate boards weakens this relationship, suggesting that diverse boards may enhance oversight and curb the financial fallout of environmental misrepresentation. Further analyses reveal that the relationship is more pronounced in privately-owned firms and largely insignificant among state-owned enterprises. A Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach confirms that greenwashing’s effect on default risk is especially severe in heavily polluting industries. Robustness checks using alternative specifications, two-step Generalised Method of Moments (GMM) estimation, Heckman selection models, Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and entropy balancing affirm the reliability of our findings. These results highlight the financial risks of greenwashing and the moderating roles of governance and market structure.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia Meng & Noman Waheed & Khalil Hussain, 2026. "Green on paper, red in risk: the default consequences of corporate greenwashing," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(5), pages 516-542, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:38:y:2026:i:5:p:516-542
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2026.2634633
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2026.2634633
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2026.2634633?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:38:y:2026:i:5:p:516-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.