IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v38y2026i4p413-443.html

Marketisation and the wage gap between public and private sectors: evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Xinxin Ma

Abstract

The determinants of the wage gap between the public and private sectors have attracted global attention. However, the empirical evidence on the impact of marketisation on this wage gap remains limited. Using national longitudinal survey data from the China Family Panel Studies for the years 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018 and employing a decomposition method, this study investigates the relationship between marketisation and the wage gap between the public and private sectors in China. The results of separate wage functions indicate that marketisation advancement may increase wages in both the public and private sectors, with a slightly larger effect observed in the private sector. Several robustness checks confirm these findings. The decomposition results show two channels that contribute to narrowing the wage gap: the differences in labour force allocations between high- and low-marketisation regions and the differences in marketisation wage premiums. The wage gap and the effects of these two channels vary across wage distributions and are more pronounced among high-wage workers than among those in the medium- and low-wage groups. These findings suggest that promoting market-oriented reforms may enhance market competition, which contributes to narrowing the wage gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinxin Ma, 2026. "Marketisation and the wage gap between public and private sectors: evidence from China," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 413-443, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:38:y:2026:i:4:p:413-443
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2026.2634640
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2026.2634640
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2026.2634640?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:38:y:2026:i:4:p:413-443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.