IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v30y2018i6p755-774.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lead, now, go! (LNG): the Shtokman field and Gazprom’s challenging partnership with Total and Statoil

Author

Listed:
  • Julia S. P. Loe

Abstract

In the early 2000s, developing liquefied natural gas (LNG) was declared a priority by the Russian state-controlled energy company Gazprom. As Gazprom had limited experience of LNG production, a logical solution was to establish partnerships with foreign companies. Despite ambitious goals, no major Gazprom-led LNG projects have emerged so far. While this can mainly be explained by market fall-out, scholars have also pointed to weaknesses in Gazprom’s approach to foreign partners. This article analyses the partnership dynamics between Gazprom, Total, and Statoil in Russia’s most ambitious LNG production project, the Shtokman field in the Barents Sea. The three companies established a partnership to develop the field in 2008, but only four years later the project was shelved. In addition to objective parameters, this paper finds that some of the challenges to the partnership resulted from differing norms, ideas, and world-views. These difficulties might, however, have been overcome had the field been commercially viable.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia S. P. Loe, 2018. "Lead, now, go! (LNG): the Shtokman field and Gazprom’s challenging partnership with Total and Statoil," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(6), pages 755-774, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:30:y:2018:i:6:p:755-774
    DOI: 10.1080/14631377.2018.1443254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14631377.2018.1443254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14631377.2018.1443254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:30:y:2018:i:6:p:755-774. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.