IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/pocoec/v16y2004i3p265-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public sector transition in post-communist economies: the struggle for fiscal decentralisation in the Czech and Slovak Republics

Author

Listed:
  • Phillip Bryson
  • Gary Cornia

Abstract

Studies of economic transition often focus on the private sector, but successful transition also requires devolution in the public sector. This study compares fiscal decentralisation in the Czech and Slovak Republics, whose institutions began to diverge only after their 1993 'velvet divorce'. This article reviews challenges confronted in this fiscal decentralisation. Local finance problems are related to revenue generation, the use of the property tax and the transfer of funds to municipalities. Local political autonomy includes the ability to exercise some autonomy in resource use. Little can be expected where sub-national governments generate little revenue independently. Potential moral hazard problems are associated with central generation of property tax revenues, as occurs in the Czech case. The EU has not promoted fiscal decentralisation in these republics, although it has encouraged 'reforms of public administration' to devolve power. But fiscal decentralisation and public administration reform are complementary strategies rather than strategy substitutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Phillip Bryson & Gary Cornia, 2004. "Public sector transition in post-communist economies: the struggle for fiscal decentralisation in the Czech and Slovak Republics," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 265-283.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:16:y:2004:i:3:p:265-283
    DOI: 10.1080/1463137042000257519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1463137042000257519
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1463137042000257519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:pocoec:v:16:y:2004:i:3:p:265-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CPCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.