IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oxdevs/v54y2026i3p317-340.html

For the good of the country? Explaining support for the Federal Character Principle in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Lucas Leopold
  • Arnim Langer
  • Ukoha Ukiwo

Abstract

Many countries have implemented policies designed to mitigate group-based or horizontal inequalities, with affirmative action programs being the most prominent examples. However, research examining the extent and motivations behind public support for such redistribution policies outside the United States remains limited. This study addresses this gap by investigating attitudes toward affirmative action in Nigeria – a nation characterised by pronounced political and economic disparities across ethnic groups and regions. Affirmative action in Nigeria is institutionalised through the Federal Character Principle (FCP) and operationally administered by the Federal Character Commission (FCC). Utilising original survey data from over 2000 Nigerian respondents, this paper analyses support for the FCP and FCC, as well as its underlying drivers. Our findings reveal that perceived societal benefits, especially the maintenance of political stability and the alleviation of ethnic inequalities, constitute significantly more influential factors shaping public endorsement of affirmative action than potential individual or group-level material gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucas Leopold & Arnim Langer & Ukoha Ukiwo, 2026. "For the good of the country? Explaining support for the Federal Character Principle in Nigeria," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 317-340, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:54:y:2026:i:3:p:317-340
    DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2026.2643188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13600818.2026.2643188
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13600818.2026.2643188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:54:y:2026:i:3:p:317-340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.