IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/oxdevs/v53y2025i4p470-487.html

Household coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Tunisia using a zero-inflated beta regression approach

Author

Listed:
  • Khaled Nasri
  • Reham Rizk

Abstract

This paper aimed to assess the differences in the adoption of coping strategies by Tunisian households during the COVID-19 pandemic. We calculated a coping strategy index that considered income-generating and expense-minimizing strategies used by households during the initial months. The effects of several variables, interpreted as determinants, on households’ ability to adapt to social distancing measures and the economic slowdown were studied using a zero-inflated beta regression model. Our findings indicate that households facing economic hardships were more likely to use coping strategies. Social support and household size had minimal effects. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these findings but revealed a nuanced relationship between job loss, social support, and coping strategies. Food market issues consistently drove coping, especially among lower-income households, while job loss effects varied by context. This study offers insights into household resilience during crises, highlighting the role of informal support networks and social support policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Khaled Nasri & Reham Rizk, 2025. "Household coping strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from Tunisia using a zero-inflated beta regression approach," Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(4), pages 470-487, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:53:y:2025:i:4:p:470-487
    DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2025.2559737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13600818.2025.2559737
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13600818.2025.2559737?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:oxdevs:v:53:y:2025:i:4:p:470-487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CODS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.